OR-Tools Providing Incorrect Solution for VRP with No Depot? Let’s Troubleshoot!

Are you struggling to get the correct solution for your Vehicle Routing Problem (VRP) using OR-Tools, only to find that the output is incorrect when there’s no depot involved? You’re not alone! In this article, we’ll dive deep into the possible reasons behind this issue and provide step-by-step solutions to help you troubleshoot and resolve the problem.

Understanding the Vehicle Routing Problem (VRP)

The Vehicle Routing Problem (VRP) is a classic problem in combinatorial optimization and operations research that involves finding the most efficient routes for a fleet of vehicles to travel in order to deliver goods or services to a set of customers. The problem becomes even more challenging when there’s no central depot, and the vehicles need to start and end at different locations.

OR-Tools: A Powerhouse for VRP Solving

OR-Tools is a popular open-source software developed by Google that provides a powerful framework for solving complex optimization problems, including the Vehicle Routing Problem. With its advanced algorithms and flexible API, OR-Tools has become a go-to tool for many researchers, developers, and businesses working on VRP solutions.

Common Issues with OR-Tools and No Depot VRP

Despite its powerful capabilities, OR-Tools may sometimes provide incorrect solutions for VRP with no depot. Let’s explore some common issues that might be causing this problem:

• Incorrect Model Formulation: If the VRP model is not formulated correctly, OR-Tools may not be able to provide the correct solution. This can include issues with the distance matrix, vehicle capacities, and time windows.
• Insufficient Computational Resources: OR-Tools requires significant computational resources to solve large-scale VRP problems. If the machine running OR-Tools lacks sufficient resources, it may lead to incorrect or incomplete solutions.
• Inadequate Search Time: The search time for the solution can be a critical factor in getting the correct output. If the search time is insufficient, OR-Tools may not be able to explore the entire solution space, leading to suboptimal or incorrect solutions.
• Buggy Implementation: If the OR-Tools API is not implemented correctly, it can lead to incorrect solutions. This can include issues with data formatting, constraint definition, and solver configuration.

Troubleshooting Steps for OR-Tools and No Depot VRP

Now that we’ve identified some common issues, let’s walk through a step-by-step troubleshooting process to help you resolve the problem:

1. Review the Model Formulation:
   • Verify the distance matrix: Ensure that the distance matrix is correctly formulated, considering the no-depot constraint.
   • Check vehicle capacities and time windows: Confirm that the vehicle capacities and time windows are correctly defined and implemented.
   • Validate the problem data: Double-check the problem data, including the number of vehicles, customers, and vehicle capacities.
2. Increase Computational Resources:
   • Upgrade the machine: Consider upgrading the machine running OR-Tools to ensure it has sufficient computational resources (CPU, memory, and disk space).
   • Distribute the computation: If possible, distribute the computation across multiple machines using parallel processing or cloud computing.
3. Adjust Search Time and Parameters:
   • Increase search time: Try increasing the search time to allow OR-Tools to explore a larger solution space.
   • Tune solver parameters: Experiment with different solver parameters, such as the local search metaheuristics, to improve the solution quality.
4. Verify the Implementation:
   • Check the data formatting: Ensure that the data is correctly formatted and passed to the OR-Tools API.
   • Review the constraint definition: Verify that the constraints are correctly defined and implemented.
   • Validate the solver configuration: Confirm that the solver configuration is correct, including the chosen algorithm and its parameters.

Example Code for OR-Tools and No Depot VRP

To illustrate the troubleshooting process, let’s consider an example code snippet in Python using the OR-Tools library:

import ortools
from ortools.constraint_solver import routing_enums_pb2
from ortools.constraint_solver import pywrapcp

def create_data_model():
  data = {}
  data['distance_matrix'] = [
    [0, 10, 15, 20],  # Node 0
    [10, 0, 35, 30],  # Node 1
    [15, 35, 0, 25],  # Node 2
    [20, 30, 25, 0]   # Node 3
  ]
  data['num_vehicles'] = 2
  data['vehicle_capacities'] = [10, 10]
  data['depot_opening_time'] = [0, 0]
  data['depot_closing_time'] = [10, 10]
  return data

def solve_vrp(data):
  manager = pywrapcp.RoutingIndexManager(len(data['distance_matrix']), data['num_vehicles'], 0)
  routing = pywrapcp.RoutingModel(manager)

  def distance_callback(from_index, to_index):
    from_node = manager.IndexToNode(from_index)
    to_node = manager.IndexToNode(to_index)
    return data['distance_matrix'][from_node][to_node]

  transit_callback_index = routing.RegisterTransitCallback(distance_callback)

  # Define the cost of each arc
  routing.SetArcCostEvaluatorOfAllVehicles(transit_callback_index)

  # Add distance constraint
  dimension_name = 'Distance'
  routing.AddDimension(
    transit_callback_index,
    0,  # no slack
    3000,  # vehicle maximum travel distance
    True,  # start cumul to zero
    dimension_name
  )
  distance_dimension = routing.GetDimensionOrDie(dimension_name)

  # Add time windows
  time_callback_index = routing.RegisterTimeCallback(lambda from_index, to_index: data['distance_matrix'][manager.IndexToNode(from_index)][manager.IndexToNode(to_index)])
  routing.SetTimeCallback(time_callback_index)

  # Add capacity constraint
  capacity_callback_index = routing.RegisterUnaryTransitCallback(lambda from_index: data['vehicle_capacities'][manager.IndexToNode(from_index)])
  routing.AddDimension(
    capacity_callback_index,
    0,  # null capacity slack
    10,  # vehicle maximum capacity
    True,  # start cumul to zero
    'Capacity'
  )

  search_parameters = pywrapcp.DefaultRoutingSearchParameters()
  search_parameters.first_solution_strategy = routing_enums_pb2.FirstSolutionStrategy.PATH_CHEAPEST_ARC

  solution = routing.SolveWithParameters(search_parameters)

  if solution:
    print('Solution found!')
    print('Total distance:', solution.ObjectiveValue())
    print('Route:')
    index = routing.Start(0)
    route = []
    while not routing.IsEnd(index):
      route.append(manager.IndexToNode(index))
      index = solution.Value(routing.NextVar(index))
    route.append(manager.IndexToNode(index))
    print('->'.join(map(str, route)))
  else:
    print('No solution found.')

if __name__ == '__main__':
  data = create_data_model()
  solve_vrp(data)

Conclusion

In this article, we explored the common issues that might cause OR-Tools to provide incorrect solutions for Vehicle Routing Problems with no depot. By following the troubleshooting steps outlined above and verifying the model formulation, computational resources, search time, and implementation, you should be able to resolve the issue and get the correct solution. Remember to review the example code and adjust the parameters to suit your specific problem requirements. Happy troubleshooting!

Common Issues	Solution
Incorrect Model Formulation	Review model formulation, distance matrix, vehicle capacities, and time windows
Insufficient Computational Resources	Upgrade machine, distribute computation, or optimize solver parameters
Inadequate Search Time	Increase search time, adjust solver parameters, or use parallel processing
Buggy Implementation	Verify data formatting, constraint definition, and solver configuration

By following these steps and guidelines, you should be able to overcome the challenges of solving Vehicle Routing Problems with no depot using OR-Tools and get the correct solution for your business needs.

Frequently Asked Question

Get answers to your most pressing questions about OR-Tools providing incorrect solution for VRP with no depot!